Search for: "People v Challenger"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 18,772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2016, 1:41 pm
See, People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
Some may recall that Judge Buckley was the lead plaintiff challenging federal regulation of campaign finance in Buckley v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 10:45 am
The article by Elizabeth Dale is titled "People v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 1:43 pm
Ergo, you definitely know the identity of your judge, and your time to challenge her accordingly starts then. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
In Nelson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 9:01 pm
In Birchfield v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm
” (Compare Craig v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:00 am
STATE V. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 4:42 am
Hoffman v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 10:09 am
Yes, constitutional law has been used to oppress Native people, but at the same time, we want to bring to the fore how Native arguments led, for example, to seminal cases such as Worcester v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am
In People v Lockridge, defendant was jury convicted of the involuntary manslaughter of his wife and faced sentencing guidelines of 43 to 86 months.Sentencing Judge Nanci Grant found "substantial and compelling" reasons to deviate from the guidelines: Lockridge killed his wife in front of their 3 young children, leaving her corpse among them; he had a probation violation, and was involved in at least one other incident of domestic violence. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:15 pm
Here are a few snippets from that exclusive profile:▫️V: Can you share any specific moments or scenes from “Makeup” that you found particularly challenging? [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:54 pm
" … It also rejected plaintiffs' Establishment Clause challenge, citing Amos v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:42 pm
The California Supreme Court ruled today in Strauss v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 2:50 pm
"If Ontario is not going to provide timely care in the public system it must not prohibit people from using their own resources to get care," says their lawyer, Avril Allen.Using precedent established by the Supreme Court of Canada's controversial 2005 decision in Chaoulli v Quebec, the lawsuit challenges Ontario's laws against direct billing by physicians, private health insurance and facility fees for patients using MRI clinics. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:38 am
Recently, a Queens County Criminal Court Judge in People v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 10:37 am
The case is Terance Gamble v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:56 am
Employment Division v. [read post]
