Search for: "People v Dollar"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 4,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
What the Chief Justice explained in the landmark Health-Care Cases (a/k/a NFIB v. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Judge Moore’s rationale for the court of appeals in Michigan Catholic Conference v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 1:48 pm
Treu, Superior Court of California, in Vergara v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 12:56 pm
I can't tell you how unsympathetic I find the founder of DiTech -- the well-known home mortgage company -- to be here.Yes, I understand that rich people don't want to pay taxes. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 3:30 am
Margossian; and U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:16 am
Entering a sentence is more than a mere recitation of months and years and dollars. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 8:27 am
D sold 1600 ebooks, thousands of dollars at stake.Court says this is a contract question. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
Depuy Orthopedics, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:27 am
Supreme Court decided Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:42 am
” Leahy emphasized recent rulings in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
The title of the proposed amendment goes even farther, claiming that it would “Restore Democracy to the American People. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:40 am
Productions v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:41 pm
The nation’s highest court granted certiorari to Comptroller v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Health care is a multibillion dollar industry, we noted, and thus regulable by Congress. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:44 pm
This case, AF Holdings v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm
That followed a pair of multi-million-dollar awards in 2010 in cases in Pitt and Guilford Counties. [read post]
23 May 2014, 2:01 pm
From Morland-Jones v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:24 am
This should scare a lot of people into thinking about corporate compliance. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:04 pm
[For those wish to the long-form legal argument, the Pacific Legal Foundation briefs in Sissel v. [read post]