Search for: "People v. Branch" Results 2341 - 2360 of 3,053
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2018, 8:27 am
Nyhan (Florence) - Generating Indigenous Peoples: The Global Knowledge Production of International Law Concepts and Categories in Context and the Significance of the Transnational Commentator – Fay Pazartzis (Athens)   18:00 Closing Session   [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 11:12 am by Florian Mueller
It's possible that many of the lawmakers who voted against the proposal simply didn't want their state, with not even a million inhabitants, to take such a fundamental decision against two of the country's largest and most powerful companies.There definitely is broadbased political support for the fight against app store monopolies: last fall, the Democratic majority of the United States House of Representatives adopted a report on digital markets that condemns the current situation… [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 2:06 pm by Ilya Somin
The Supreme Court will soon enough have the opportunity to weigh in on those issues in Dobbs v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 8:05 am
Analysis NOTE: Nearly a quarter-century ago, in Navy Department v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:00 pm
Kentucky's protocol lacksbasic safeguards used by other States to confirm that an inmate is unconscious before injection of the second and 2 BAZE v. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:55 pm
However, enter the opinion of the wise and learned Judge Arthur Tarnow of the District Court of the Eastern District of Michigan in Feiger and Steinberg v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:13 am
  That argument’s never made any headway:   it was rejected in State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 6:37 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Although the court agreed that the defendant’s strategy was to take advantage of the flow of people seeking out the plaintiff based on the value of their names, they likened it to a competitor who opened a branch office next door. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]