Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 2341 - 2360 of 5,670
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2012, 5:00 am by Jessica Dorsey
by Jessica Dorsey The ICJ is set to deliver its judgment in Belgium v. [read post]
The court also held that DACA failed the first step in Chevron USA v Natural Res. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:16 pm
the Colorado Supreme Court handed Ward Churchill the latest in a series of losses, in Churchill v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:16 am by Sherry F. Colb
ColbIn Justice Alito's (SA's) leaked opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:20 pm
In particular, the prospect of financial gain gives rise to a bias that the defense attorney may explore when cross-examining an accuser. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am by centerforartlaw
No matter the outcome, the case aims to provide clarity around whether ethical considerations of sourcing immense amounts of copyrighted material—instrumental in training in AI image generators—cross the line into unlawful conduct. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 1:12 pm by Judy Selby
Posted by Judy SelbyEditor's note: This is a cross-blog post with BakerHostetler’s Class Action Lawsuit Defense blog. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 5:07 am by John Tarley
Complicating the matter was a seemingly conflicting decision by the Circuit Court of neighboring Loudon County, a decision that was affirmed by the Virginia Supreme Court in Lee’s Crossing v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 10:29 am by John Tarley
Complicating the matter was a seemingly conflicting decision by the Circuit Court of neighboring Loudon County, a decision that was affirmed by the Virginia Supreme Court in Lee’s Crossing v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 11:07 am by Jeff Gamso
  And so the Supreme Court said that while it's not OK to kill the insane, it's perfectly fine to kill crazy people as long as they aren't insane in a particular way.The Court decided Ford v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:50 pm by Unknown
The Court of Appeals has found that certain industry specific artificial intelligence technology is generally accepted (People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
This decision prompted establishment of the so-called "rule of three," currently set out in Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law and held valid by the Court of Appeals in People v Gaffney, 201 NY 535. [read post]