Search for: "R. Grounds" Results 2341 - 2360 of 47,323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2021, 1:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds of forum non conveniens. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 10:51 am by Beth Allgood
We support communities on the ground by linking wildlife conservation with holistic community wellbeing to improve both conservation outcomes and community wellbeing. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:49 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  However, the Court also held that Defendant overreached in applying the 4/5 Rule because: (1) it ignored the part of the rule indicating, “[s]maller differences in selection rate may nevertheless constitute adverse impact, where they are significant in both statistical and practical terms or where a user’s actions have discouraged applicants disproportionately on ground of race, sex, or ethnic group”; (2) Defendant’s own calculations were just above 80% and… [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 4:23 am by Clifford Winston
Professor Richard Epstein challenged their finding on the grounds that the authors did not control for potential selectivity bias in the case petitions that the Roberts court accepts. [read post]
The FTC ended its statement with a note that practices associated with AI should be “grounded in established FTC consumer protection principles,” and that the FTC’s “recommendations for transparency and independence can help [companies] do just that. [read post]
For example, a corporation has no constitutional privilege against self-incrimination and cannot contest a subpoena on the ground that the Fifth Amendment protects its documents from discovery. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 4:23 am by Clifford Winston
Firms in other industries operate ethically as public corporations; the exclusion of corporations providing legal services has been justified on the unsubstantiated grounds that corporations would be conflicted between representing their shareholders and their clients. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:53 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
Even the national Court (Justice Arnold) that had sent the preliminary questions to the CJEU in that case, complained that the answers of the CJEU (the infamous “It follows” of par. 25), in reality, did not “follow” from the legal grounds of the decision. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:47 pm by Matthias Weller
Funded by Elite Network of Bavaria the International Doctorate Programme „Business and Human Rights: Governance Challenges in a Complex World“ (IDP B&HR_Governance) establishes an inter- and transdisciplinary research forum for excellent doctoral projects addressing practically relevant problems and theoretically grounded questions in the field of business and human rights. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 1:02 am by Tessa Shepperson
A plan of action It’s always a good idea to have a plan so here are some suggestions: Take advice – although advice services seem to be fairly thin on the ground. [read post]
However, since the BOA limited its examination to the sole absolute ground provided for in art. 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 and did not examine art. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:08 pm by Matthew D. Adler
In one of his first actions after the inauguration, President Joseph R. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:47 am by Russell Knight
App. 3d 102, 104 (1989), rev’d on other grounds, 138 Ill. 2d 162 (1990)) Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel are principles devoted to “promoting judicial economy and preventing repetitive litigation. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 pm by Unknown
.]- Chapter 1: The EU framework of return policies in the EuroMediterranean Region [text]- Chapter 2: Returns from Spain to Morocco [text]- Chapter 3: Forced Returns from France to Morocco [text]- Chapter 4: The Policy of Forced Returns Between Italy and Tunisia [text]- Chapter 5: Egypt: a repressive environment, fertile ground for the EU’s return obsession [text]- Chapter 6: Pushbacks and expulsions from Cyprus and Lebanon: The dangers of (chain) refoulement to Syria… [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:01 pm by Giles Peaker
In Hayley Pearce v Michael Jones & Company and Ms Valerie Quick (2021) (no judgment available yet, link to Shelter post on the case), the court held – apparently by consent after agreement was reached at the door of court – that ‘The First and Second defendants unlawfully indirectly discriminated against the claimant on the ground of sex contrary to section 19 and 29 of the Equality Act 2010 when the first defendants former trainee informed the claimant that people in… [read post]