Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES "
Results 2341 - 2360
of 9,847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2009, 9:42 am
Co. of the State of PA v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 3:14 pm
Laird, an original action in the United States Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Vietnam War, Sturgis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 am
United States, Berghuis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:24 am
The BLT: The Blog of Legal Times reports that last year Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. won praise for quoting Bob Dylan in an opinion (a dissent, actually, in Spring Communications Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:34 am
Robert Auerbach. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
United States it was both. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 1:57 pm
Tumey, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit on March 4, 2022. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:18 am
The United States government has concluded that she is being wrongfully detained. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
United States, which involves the scope of the prosecution’s duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under the Brady rule. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
That question was recently addressed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:47 pm
Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., United States Supreme Court, Docket #11-393 In 2010, Congress enacted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, [124 Stat. 119]. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 10:56 am
They lashed out against other units and the government. [read post]
8 May 2016, 4:37 pm
Justice Sotomayor, for example, wrote in her concurrence in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:41 am
United States, Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:27 am
In the first paragraph of Roberts’ opinion in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 3:00 am
See State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
Bell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm
It is also possible that the Trump administration (which is no fan of Obamacare) will choose not to defend the constitutionality of the mandate, in which case the court might appoint an independent lawyer to defend the statute (as it did in the 1982 Bob Jones case) or allow blue states to step in to defend (as lawyers hired by mostly Republican members Congress were allowed to step in to defend a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, which the Obama administration refused to defend in… [read post]
