Search for: "Reach v. State"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 37,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2022, 12:49 pm
For example in Almonacid-Arellano et al. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:40 am
Yet another Feta case has reached the European Court of Justice (ECJ). [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:00 am
Lord Sumption rejected this, stating that the directives leave various matters to member states to determine, but the domestic schemes were nonetheless part of a scheme for implementing an EU tax. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
Justice Thomas would restrict the reach of the FAA so that it does not reach state courts. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 7:32 am
After the Supreme Court's ruling in Cuomo v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
” Thus, “Section 2421A(a)’s mental state requirement does not reach the intent to engage in general advocacy about prostitution, or to give advice to sex workers generally to protect them from abuse. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 8:52 am
On Monday, June 1, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Bilski v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Not for Publication United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 1:08 pm
Nunn v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 8:25 am
Pride Sausage Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:11 pm
(Hughes v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:52 pm
RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2019) UKSC 52 The question of the powers of the First Tier and Upper Tribunals (and indeed initial decision makers) to disapply secondary legislation where there is a breach of the appellant’s human rights has reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 May 2008, 8:57 am
United States (1983), and Young v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:26 am
Secondly, it raises fundamental issues regarding the reach of the ultra vires doctrine to appeal decisions made under unlawful procedural rules and the concept of “nullity”. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:37 am
F.J.A.P. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:17 am
Here, the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice because the plaintiff’s allegation that the restaurant would have had increased profits but for the defendants’ alleged malpractice is [*2]conclusory and speculative (see York v Frank, 209 AD3d at 807; Denisco v Uysal, 195 AD3d at 991). [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:46 am
State v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:38 am
Short v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:54 am
In Lynch v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 10:54 am
In Lynch v. [read post]
