Search for: "Research In Motion Limited"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,047
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 7:08 pm
It is estimated that IV has generated a total of US$1 billion in licensing revenues from their acquired patents as of 2009.[2] As proof that the business model is thriving (at least for IV), on March 30, 2011, IV announced that Research In Motion (RIM) entered into a license agreement with them to provide RIM with access to IV’s extensive patent portfolio of more than 30,000 IP assets. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:58 pm
We granted the motion. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Therefore, we reverse and enter judgment for Crown on its cross-motion. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:38 am
The decision limits the participation of governments in discovery to the property at issue. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:59 pm
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” The following criminal cases of note were decided this week: Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:52 am
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) and the Respondents are Research In Motion, Ltd., Research In Motion Corporation (collectively, “RIM”), and Apple Inc. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:27 am
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted the motion to dismiss. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:30 am
The reason is because I did do a lot of research. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:29 pm
In deciding a motion for summary judgment, "[t]he evidence of the non-movant is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his favor. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:01 am
She would want to limit the jurisdiction to BC and ideally to the substantive issue at hand. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
He could even have done his own research. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:27 am
It’s entirely fair to send a draft contract or brief accompanied by a cover e-mail that explains the limitations of what you’ve done: “At your request, we did not take depositions of the following third party witnesses [identified by name], and we did not research possible choice-of-law permutations, because you didn’t think this matter warranted that effort. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
With respect to potential remedy, the Complaint requests that the Commission issue a permanent limited exclusion order and a permanent cease and desist order directed at Nintendo. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:13 am
Unique Product Solutions, Limited v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am
Village Resorts Limited (2010), 98 O.R. (3d) 721 (C.A.) [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 1:02 am
March 22 — Four Democratic senators on Tuesday penned a letter to Apple, Google, and Research in Motion to urge the companies to remove apps that provide users with information about DUI checkpoints. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:57 am
" Rather, "something more is needed -- but "something more" is "not limited to statistical significance. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:06 am
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Ohio: Qui Tam provisions of false marking statute are unconstitutional even if considered civil or civil-criminal hybrid: Unique Product Solutions, Limited v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:03 pm
As such, the Motion is granted in its entirety. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:23 pm
Had Congress intended "include" to mean "is limited to," well, "it would have said so. [read post]
