Search for: "Richard v. Richard" Results 2341 - 2360 of 12,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2007, 2:52 am
., sitting in the federal district court in Mississippi, denied a motion filed by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company to disqualify Richard ("Dickie") Scruggs, his law firm, and other attorneys and firms in the Scruggs Katrina Group from representing plaintiffs in the case of McIntosh v. [read post]
Unsatisfactory rating voided because employee's "performance review," failed to comply with the employer's own procedures and thus undermined the integrity of the process Joyce v City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 03433, Appellate Division, First Department The Appellate Division annulled the determination of respondent New York City Department of Education [DOE] sustaining the "unsatisfactory" rating for the 2010-2011 academic year give to John Joyce, a tenured teacher. The court said that the record demonstrates "deficiencies in the performance review process" that resulted in Mr. Joyce being given an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year. Citing Matter of Gumbs v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. Dist. of the City of N.Y., 117 AD3d 605, the Appellate Division noted that these deficiencies "were not merely technical, but undermined the integrity and fairness of the process." Mr. Joyce had received a satisfactory rating for the previous academic year and, in contravention of its own procedures, DOE failed to place him on notice that he was in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating for the 2010-2011 academic year until after April 28, 2011. Although DOE's procedures required that tenured teachers in danger of receiving an unsatisfactory rating have "formal observations including a pre-observation and post-observation conference by the principal ... as part of a prescriptive plan to improve their teaching," Mr. Joyce received only one formal observation which took place one week before the end of the academic year and was not part of a prescriptive plan to improve his performance as a teacher. The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_03433.htm
30 May 2018, 4:37 am by Public Employment Law Press
Dist. of the City of N.Y., 125 AD3d 484, and Matter of Richards v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:06 am
Hastings’ involvement in mass killings of Native Americans.Judge Richard B. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 2:15 pm by Andrew Hamm
Today the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 4:15 am by Ted Frank
As Daniel Fisher notes, one of the amicus briefs features the odd couple of Richard Epstein and Nader attorney Alan Morrison. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
For the Symposium on Richard Albert, Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions (Oxford University Press, 2019). [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:53 pm by Ted Frank
Speaking of third-party liability for crime, consider the case of Bonilla v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 12:33 pm
The Ohio Supreme Court had affirmed the conviction and death sentence in 1996.In a 2002 case, Atkins v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:49 am by Richard Hunt
On March 27 Richard was interviewed by the Morning Dose program on the CW network concerning the Facebook lawsuit about which we blogged yesterday. [read post]