Search for: "Smith v. People"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2010, 5:44 am
Footnote 11 in Brown v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:55 pm
and just 2% of counties sent people to death row. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 8:05 am
Kids’ Mild Brain Injury Can Have Long-Term Effect, August 24, 2016, By Maureen Salamon, WebMD More Blog Entries: Alcala v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
Barry v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:46 am
In the 2012 United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Twenty-two years earlier, in Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 7:38 am
In addition, the hearing will explore the authorities available to the Administration and the international community to protect the people of Hong Kong, Uyghurs, Kazakhs, and others. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 8:41 pm
v=qp0HIF3SfI4 *Disclosure: This event was sponsored by OpenText and free to the public. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:17 pm
The decision in Warren v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 9:05 am
But in another case, McIntyre v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 3:58 am
State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:43 pm
For example, if a trust owns a home and the trustee is John Smith, title to the property would be held, loosely stated, as "John Smith, trustee of the Smith Trust. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 5:57 am
Kovich v. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdiction Australia The trial of the Ben Roberts-Smith libel claim against various newspapers has begun. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
The ruling will have an effect on people trying to use takedowns to censor speech, and the court flags this as a problem. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am
Smith v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm
Smith, Karolyne Garner, for Terry Carter, Respondent. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
