Search for: "Smith v. People"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,955
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2013, 1:20 pm
It is well settled that a defendant's statutory right to testify before the grand jury " must be scrupulously protected' " (People v Smith, 87 NY2d 715, 721, quoting People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, 332). [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:00 am
Smith-GreenMortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts--Tatro v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:03 am
U.S. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 1:23 pm
They argue that this divide is exemplified by the the Supreme Court’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
Speed is advised since Shireen is limiting attendance to just 12 people -- though this Kat hears that, if there's enough interest, she will run a further Brief. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm
The Fourth Amendment does not bar the government’s proposed collection of telephony metadata, she writes, because the production “is squarely controlled by” Smith v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:12 am
Smith, 424 Md. 294 (2012). [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 12:59 pm
Smith-GreenMortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts--Tatro v. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 5:38 am
Perhaps they are the sort of people who have to be really careful when they book their holidays in case they confuse Land's End with the conceptually identical Finisterre. [read post]
14 Sep 2013, 11:28 am
Such misconduct may impair a defendant's due process rights and require a reversal of the conviction (see, e.g., People v Robertson, 12 NY2d 355; People v Savvides, 1 NY2d 554; People v Creasy, 236 NY 205; Napue v Illinois, 360 US 264; Alcorta v Texas, 355 US 28). [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 4:17 pm
Article 6 of the Civil Rights Law provides a formal procedure for changing a name, which provides the advantages of being speedy, definite and a matter of record as was done in Smith v United States. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm
Not until counsel has been “repeatedly unconscious through not insubstantial portions” of even capital murder trials will prejudice to the defendant will be presumed (see, Muniz v Smith, 647 F3d 619 [6th Cir 2011]; Burdine v Johnson, 262 F3d 336, 340-41 [5th Cir 2001]; Tippins v Walker, 77 F3d 682, 685 [2nd Cir 1996]). [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Smith is principal of The Smith Appellate Law Firm in Washington, D.C., and Ellicott City, Md. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 9:55 am
Smith, who innocently got behind the wheel of a dangerous and improperly maintained car that caused him a serious injury. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 2:36 pm
The court notes that information provided by an identified citizen accusing another individual of the commission of a specific crime is sufficient to provide the police with probable cause to arrest as also ruled in People v Lee, Kramer v City of New York and People v Gonzalez. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 4:55 am
State v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:21 am
Now people can quibble with this reasoning. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 2:16 pm
Bray v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:30 pm
Jeannette Cockroft has reviewed Keira V. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 8:27 am
Smith and Akhil Amar). [read post]
