Search for: "Soling v. New York State" Results 2341 - 2360 of 3,667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Third-party defendant and second-third party defendant Heatley also moves, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party and second third-party actions against it in accordance with Section 23 of the Massachusetts Workers' Compensation Law which bars all third-party actions against the employer in common law; or, in the alternative, in the absence of a finding of "grave injury," in accordance with Section 11 of the New York Workers' Compensation Law. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Third-party defendant and second-third party defendant Heatley also moves, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party and second third-party actions against it in accordance with Section 23 of the Massachusetts Workers' Compensation Law which bars all third-party actions against the employer in common law; or, in the alternative, in the absence of a finding of "grave injury," in accordance with Section 11 of the New York Workers' Compensation Law. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:11 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The New York Court of Appeals has interpreted Civil Service Law section 71 as mandating reinstatement of an employee, previously terminated due to the inability to perform his duties resulting from a work related injury, once the county civil service office has certified the employee as fit to work. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:11 am by Silverberg Zalantis LLP
The New York Court of Appeals has interpreted Civil Service Law section 71 as mandating reinstatement of an employee, previously terminated due to the inability to perform his duties resulting from a work related injury, once the county civil service office has certified the employee as fit to work. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 3:54 pm
In one New York case, a defendant was observed by an undercover police officer selling drugs. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Nov. 8, 2012), primarily concerning its fraudulent joinder holding – in accord with the “overwhelming weight of authority” in other states – that a hospital cannot be strictly liable for claimed defects in drugs and medical devices that are used in medical procedures within its walls. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 2:00 am by Peter Mahler
The Supreme Court’s unusually rough treatment of Chancellor Strine’s Auriga ruling has attracted much attention in the blogosphere and press, including an article in the New York Times (read here) reporting speculation about “simmering tension” between the Chancellor and Supreme Court Chief Justice Myron Steele over fiduciary doctrine in the LLC setting which, I guess, is what passes for a blood feud in the corporate-law alleyways of Wilmington. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 1:58 pm by Louis Leichter
However, in January of 2012 the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York held the precise opposite. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
  While the trend has picked up recently, the first such case was filed on January 13, 2012 against AmDocs Ltd. in New York County Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
  While the trend has picked up recently, the first such case was filed on January 13, 2012 against AmDocs Ltd. in New York County Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
While the trend has picked up recently, the first such case was filed on January 13, 2012 against AmDocs Ltd. in New York County Supreme Court.  [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 1:48 am by Kevin LaCroix
  While the trend has picked up recently, the first such case was filed on January 13, 2012 against AmDocs Ltd. in New York County Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm by JakeMcGowan
A district court in New York encountered such a situation in DISH Network v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 9:44 am by Marc Freeman
Republican in New York may as well stay home on Election Day. [read post]