Search for: "Stanford Law Review" Results 2341 - 2360 of 3,687
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2010, 2:54 pm by Dwight Sullivan
This term’s Project Outreach arguments will be at Brooklyn Law School on 2 November, at Hofstra University Law School on 3 November, and at Stanford University Law School and the University of the Pacific (McGeorge) Law School in the spring. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Kurt Lash, A Textual-Historical Theory of the Ninth Amendment, 60 Stanford Law Review (2008). [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Kurt Lash, A Textual-Historical Theory of the Ninth Amendment, 60 Stanford Law Review (2008). [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 2:33 pm by Tom Smith
I once had a student ask me if he should take the opportunity to transfer to Stanford law school. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 6:34 am by Ronald Mann
  Then in Board of Trustees of Stanford University v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:27 am by Eugene Volokh
Well, in Treaties, International Law, and Constitutional Rights, published in 2003 in the Stanford Law Review (one of the top three law journals in the country, Prof. [read post]
13 Sep 2006, 5:25 am
Her résumé -- Harvard College, Stanford Law School, #1 in the history of her law school, Stanford Law Review (senior articles editor) -- is a work of art. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
  The decision is Leave.Eu Group Ltd and Eldon Insurance Services Ltd (EA/2019/ 0054-0059) [PDF] Datacentre Dynamics has reviewed upcoming data oriented legislation. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:11 am by Kelly
Becton-Dickinson (Patent Docs) US government intervenes in patentability of genes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inovia) (BlawgIT) (IP Osgoode) US: BIO and AUTM fire back at gene patent foes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) US: IPO files amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) US: AIPLA submits amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: Summary of Myriad patent claims under… [read post]
7 May 2009, 8:39 pm
Professor Sunder used this story to emphasize the importance of cultural dissent (also the title of an article of hers in the Stanford Law Review). [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by INFORRM
On 15 December 2021 there was a pre-trial review in the case of Banks v Cadwalladr before Nicklin J. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The President elect’s views on media law issues are controversial. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
This echos a 2007 Stanford Law Review article by Lemley and Doug Lichtman, and Lichtman makes the same point in a (tritely titled) New York Times op-ed. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
Patel, in which the Court held that a Los Angeles ordinance which allows police to inspect hotel guest registries without advance notice or a warrant is unconstitutional because it does not provide an opportunity for precompliance review, comes from Hadar Aviram at PrawfsBlawg and Robert Weisberg for the Stanford Lawyer. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 1:07 pm by rbm3
Hein, 2011 KF246 P73 2011 See Catalog Civil law -- Canada RULED BY LAW : REPRINTED FROM VOLUME 12 OF THE SUPREME COURT LAW REVIEW, SECOND SERIES / LIONEL D. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 3:08 am by Gail Kent
My own work at Stanford showed that the UK wasn’t alone in having delayed or dropped serious cases due to not obtaining international data in a timely manner. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:52 pm by Gene Takagi
The Future of Elite Giving Stanford Social Innovation Review: “Talking about race is in fact the only way democracy can succeed in a multiracial society. [read post]