Search for: "State v. A. T. D."
Results 2341 - 2360
of 23,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2010, 11:21 am
Amigon, 233 F.Supp.2d 462 (E.D.N.Y.2002), the court stated that Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:11 am
" The Supreme Court held in American Airlines v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
§ 2254(d)(1) outside the context of a capital sentencing hearing. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:57 am
§ 1332(d)(11). [read post]
20 May 2008, 1:15 am
Solis Betancourt, --- F.Supp.2d ----, 2007 WL 5173642 (D. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 6:03 pm
Patachou, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Supp. 724 (D. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
CV-21-01540-PHX-DGC (D. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 3:59 am
The case is State v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:38 am
" United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 11:07 am
The Moody v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
For example, in United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 8:16 am
The Rule reflects a clear judgment that prosecutors (at least state prosecutors — federal prosecutors have sometimes claimed that they are not bound by state ethical rules that contradict federal policy) can't withhold exculpatory evidence based on their subjective belief that it's not credible or not useful to the defense or wouldn't make a difference. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 5:01 am
§ 2265(d)(3), since they aren't state governments. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
§ 1332(d). [read post]
8 May 2015, 8:54 am
I don't practice DUI or criminal law, so I don't know how this typically plays out in the real world, but I'd be willing to bet that 100% of the people who try to avoid checkpoints get pulled over even though the vast majority should not. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
See Hay v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 7:31 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 6:03 am
Franceschi v. [read post]
