Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 12:27 am
The Secretary of State for Justice v RB & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1608 (20 December…. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Last month, Judge Green of the Los Angeles County Superior Court in Crest v. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
The problem with vagueness was spelt out by the House of Lords in R v Rimmington, citing the US case of Grayned: "Vagueness offends several important values … A vague law impermissibly delegates basic policy matters to policemen, judges and juries for resolution on an ad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm
Clause 4 is a ‘reasonable publication’ defence not a ‘responsible publication’ defence reflecting the latest common law as outlined by Lord Brown in Flood v Times. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar, the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 has also commenced proceedings, with a hearing fixed for Thursday 5 September 2019. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 6:02 am
Standard Folding Bed Co., 157 U.S. 659 (1895). [10] In the paper, I expand on Judge Taranto’s and Professors Duffy and Hynes’ arguments that Justice Breyer’s citation to Lord Coke’s 1628 Institutes in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
On the same date HHJ Parkes reserved judgment in the case of Woodrow v Johansson On 20 January 2012, the Administrative Court handed down judgment in the R (Associated Newspapers) v Lord Justice Leveson ([2012] EWHC 57 (Admin)). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:52 pm
Sedley LJ and Lord Clarke MR agreed with Rix LJ, but Sedley LJ expressed some dissatisfaction with this case. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 8:14 am
There is no difference between this Ten Commandments display and the one at the Texas state capitol that was upheld by the U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:55 am
Instead he found a real live action brought by the Spanish against our lords and masters in the Council of the European Union itself: Case C-274/11 Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union, to be precise. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:21 am
To further justify deference, the court cited A v Secretary of State for the Home Department, also known as the Belmarsh 9 case, in which the English House of Lords held that deference would be given to the executive’s decision on the assessment of public emergency and the counter-measure devised after the 9/11 terrorist attack in the US. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm
The Society of Editors had a piece “Remote access to court hearings likely to take “one step back” confirms Lord Chief Justice”. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 4:21 pm
As Lord Atkinson observed in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417: “Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 12:11 am
My read of the transcript of the February 6 State Farm v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:46 am
In Impression Products Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
The problem here, though, is that the Supreme Court in Miami Herald v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 12:44 pm
Perhaps the best-known example is the House of Lords decision in R v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (“SLSC”) has identified a re-attempt by the Government to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to lower the threshold for police intervention in respect of protests that was already rejected in January 2023 in the Public Order Bill—now the Public Order Act 2023. [read post]
