Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 4,020
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
The argument concerned four applications from industrial polluters and allied States (consolidated under Ohio v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm
The rule is designed to reduce power plant emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide that, according to the release, travel to other states and damage their environment. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:19 pm
Case #1: Mathis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:27 pm
At the very least, the company must be formally registered to do business in the state, have offices or plants or stores in the state, have agents in the state, etc. [read post]
7 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
State v. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 7:26 am
The Retromark update also listed the infamous Lidl v Tesco case, in which the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) reversed the copyright infringement finding but reluctantly upheld the trade mark infringement ruling; the Lifestyle Equities v Amazon case, where the UK Supreme Court confirmed that Amazon US was targeting UK consumers; and the commonly misunderstood Supermacs v EUIPO case where, the General Court of the EU merely stated that McDonalds’ use of… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 5:34 pm
FWS-R1-ES-2009-0085 / MO 92210-0-0009 / RIN 1018-AW88 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Revised Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm
Hearn cites a 1997 Supreme Court case (Old Chief v. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
But with the case of the United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
In Karlo v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:03 am
Freeze v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:23 pm
Circuit vacated both the Trump Administration’s decision to repeal the 2015 Clean Power Plan, which established guidelines for states to limit carbon dioxide emissions from power plants, and the Affordable Clean Energy Rule that the Trump administration issued in its place. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Some states close the causation question at the "I would still prescribe" stage. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
In those applications, Bayer represented that the active ingredient in its plant protection product, spirotetramat, was protected by its basic patent. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:30 pm
But this week, SCOTUS heard oral argument in Gundy v. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. (09 Civ. 4515). [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:52 pm
Cornelius v. [read post]
