Search for: "State v. R. G."
Results 2341 - 2360
of 4,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2007, 11:30 am
R. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:52 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 1:41 pm
Co., Inc. v Roth & Roth, L.L.P., 85 AD3d 467 [1st Dept 2011]; see also Goldstein Affiliates v Affiliated FM Ins. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 2:34 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 9:37 am
Interlocutory appeal for medical residents at state hospitals (two cases) Geoffrey Klein, M.D. and Baylor College of Medicine v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:20 am
Rights Comm’n v. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 5:42 pm
In namentlicher Abstimmung votierten 412 Abgeordnete für den Gesetzentwurf, 159 stimmten dagegen, 59 enthielten sich. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am
In an opinion authored by Justice Thomas G. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
December 18, 2015 / 64(49);1359-62 Julie R. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:37 pm
G. v Anthony P. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 8:50 am
In Goers v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 7:24 am
Texas Citizens for a Safe Future and Clean Water and James G. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
[Alicia G. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:01 am
Neiman Marcus Group, Inc., June 26, 2017, Pratt, R.). [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 1:27 pm
Integra Lifesciences v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am
In Henderson v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm
Secretary of State. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:26 am
Although an employer was victorious on summary judgment, its request for attorneys’ fees under the ADA and Sec. 1927 was rejected after a federal district court found that an EEOC determination letter concluding the employer discriminated against an employee provided a reasonable, non-frivolous basis for her lawsuit (Murphy v Samson Resources Co, June 21, 2013, Frizzell, G). [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 1:04 am
The brief, filed by Solicitor General Gregory G. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
United States, the Court found the terms of the solicitation violated the SBA regulations regarding the evaluation of mentor-protégé offerors.[6] Specifically, the SBA regulations regarding mentor-protégé offerors states, “A procuring activity may not require the protégé firm to individually meet the same evaluation or responsibility criteria as that required of other offerors generally. [read post]
