Search for: "State v. Square"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 6,576
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 2:58 pm
In contrast, Judge Gorsuch, in a concurring opinion in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:44 am
"The case is Salazar-Limon v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 3:47 am
Already, the blawgosphere is atwitter over the class action filed in Robbins v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:30 am
Depending on the square footage of their homes, class members who are current homeowners can be paid between $6500 and $17,000. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 7:50 am
Moreover, as Chief Justice Marshall noted in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:59 pm
Brantley v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:17 am
The 2014 edition of Chambers & Partners states that "...he has a solid commercial appreciation of what's involved in a case". [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
Accordingly, the Appellate Division concluded that Supreme Court should have granted those branches of the petition which sought to compel disclosure of the documents sought in Plaintiff's FOIL requests that were the subject of this appeal. * New York State Public Officers Law Article 6. ** See Matter of Data Tree, LLC v Romaine, 9 NY3d 454.*** The basic concept underlying FOIL is that all government documents and records, other than those having access specifically limited… [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:21 am
The assignment to patrol duty is a “job duty” that falls squarely within the discretion of the police department. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:33 am
In Woo v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:39 am
The court held otherwise, finding the claims to be “squarely within the parameters” of Buckman Co. v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm
Is the Court’s per curiam ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:18 am
For example, in United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Griffith v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 5:21 pm
Life Receivables Trust v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:42 am
The specific test under the ECHR for justifying discrimination in the context of state benefits is set out in Stec v United Kingdom (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, a decision of the Strasbourg Grand Chamber. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:00 am
Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 1:51 pm
The Claimants’ claim is based squarely on the extension of liability set down in D v East Berkshire. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
Bill Ruthhart of the Indianapolis Star reports this afternoon on the Supreme Court decision earlier today in the case of City of Carmel, Indiana v. [read post]
