Search for: "State v. Taylor "
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
Supreme Court of United States. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Two rulings by state courts illustrate this point, Croman v City University of New York, 277 AD2d 185, and Parisi v NYC Housing Authority, Appellate Division, First Department, 269 AD2d 210. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:44 am
The stories of Alan Gell, Greg Taylor and Darryl Hunt are not hypothetical. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:03 am
After holding that “the subject of the claim sought to be arbitrated is the type authorized by the Taylor Law,” the Appellate Division explained: Contrary to the District's contention, an arbitrator's award in favor of the Association would not violate public policy. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
This point is illustrated in ruling by the Appellate Division in Taylor v Cass, 505 NY2d 929. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm
Yesterday in Cullen v. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:54 am
Interpreting contract language Local 589 v Cuevas, 271 AD2d 535 Using clear and unambiguous language in a collective bargaining agreement makes it easier for a court to resolve the meaning of a Taylor Law contract provision. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:30 am
Corp. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:14 pm
“In this case, the district court found that Taylor’s testimony went beyond a ‘general denial of his involvement in the drug activity’ and that he committed perjury by [...] [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Although not identified as an issue in the Richfield Springs case, as the Appellate Division, Second Department noted in Port Washington USFD v Port Washington Teachers Association, 268 AD2d 523, [motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 761], a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration.In Port Washington, the parties agreed to include a specific religious holiday provision in a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
Anonymity v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:28 am
Stoval v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:31 am
& Awning, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
On Tuesday 29 March, the Privy Council will hear another case from the Court of Appeal of Jamaica concerning the murder of Mr Dexter Taylor. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Here is the abstract: In Graham v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:03 am
He appeals on the basis of State v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
RIP you insane, crazy and remarkable lady.On to the swillers......Castillo v. [read post]
