Search for: "Strange v. Strange"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 3,726
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2011, 3:06 pm
In Lavallee v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:22 am
The Goodfarb case is also cited in Harvard law professor-author Randall Kennedy‘s book, “Nigger: the strange career of a troublesome word. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 4:48 am
(Delighted to welcome back alumna Leila Nadya Sadat, who contributes this guest post)The majority opinion in Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:26 am
But if I had to choose, I'd probably say that Judge Ikuta's dissent has the better of the argument over Judge Kozinski's majority opinion.Judge Kozinski, as he sometimes does, pitches his opinion with mystery and guile, commencing his missive with the following introductory paragraph:"This is a strange case. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 2:47 am
One of my co-defendants in Rakofsky v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Mullenix, Strange Bedfellows: The Politics of Preemption, 59 Case W. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:51 pm
The biggest story of the last few days comes courtesy of our privacy law bloggers, as we've seen a flurry of conversation from them on Anderson v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Mullenix, Strange Bedfellows: The Politics of Preemption, 59 Case W. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:14 am
Tort law and privacy seem to make strange bedfellows. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:08 am
(I have no one in particular in mind here, but, by way of example, in recent years a number of people seem to have argued both sides of Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:50 am
Carmelina Vera Rojas, No. 10-14662, and United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:57 am
GangulySupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Remdeo Chauhan @ Rajnath Chauhan v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
Steve Vladeck has this Martinez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:13 am
Given the implications of the rule for which the petitioner in Martinez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
We knew going into oral argument this week that the statute at issue in Reynolds v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:56 am
Perhaps rather strangely pronouncing that "? [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 6:28 am
Referencing Smith v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
High Court Denies Inventors Plea to Punish Law Firm Perhaps surprising no one but the petitioner, the strange case of Lockwood v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 11:34 am
In McNeil v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
I noticed, strangely, that appellant’s counsel only filed reply briefs in 2 of the cases to be argued. [read post]
