Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 7,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2006, 8:27 am
The treatise is the standard reference in antitrust and the common-law nature of antitrust in the United States makes the treatise particularly influential. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 3:36 am
Citizens United categorically rejected the rationale of Austin v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:41 am
United States, the thermal imaging case, we had this line-up:SCALIA, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which SOUTER, THOMAS, GINSBURG, and BREYER, JJ., joined. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 1:20 pm
Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 11:12 am
Wisconsin Right to Life, the Roberts Court took the opposite path, striking down campaign finance laws in major cases, including Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 7:14 am
Just when we thought Member States had succeeded in removing many of the most concerning crimes from the convention’s text, they could be making a reappearance. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 12:08 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
24 May 2013, 6:52 am
If the shirts had been sold in the United States, Rihanna would have a strong claim of violation of her right of publicity. [read post]
26 May 2014, 11:00 am
That opportunity dissolves if Customs seizes the merchandise before the case is brought before the United States Court of International Trade. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:05 am
That trade secret protection, as weak or as strong as one views it, is an alternative form of protection for an invention was emphatically recognized by the United States Supreme Court in the 1974 case of Kewanee Oil Co. v Bicron Oil. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
The speech, even if erroneous or knowingly false might fall outside First Amendment protections, especially if they were spoken by an ordinary person, not the President of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Art Museums in the United States While there are a few examples of public (e.g., Smithsonian museums) and for-profit (e.g., International Spy Museum) museums, the majority of museums in the United States—especially art museums—are nonprofit organizations with a 501(c)(3) status.[3] This means that most museums in this country are considered charities described under both § 501(c)(3) and § 170(c)(2), receiving most tax benefits among 29… [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
For one thing, it's not just the United States pushing this agenda; Europe is doing so also. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am
For one thing, it's not just the United States pushing this agenda; Europe is doing so also. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 2:11 pm
(Briseno v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 2:51 pm
Litigants can choose to resolve their disputes through the United States Patent & Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) or initiate an action in the Federal court system. [read post]
6 May 2019, 6:12 am
Dohme v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 10:57 am
United States, a U.S. treaty-power case. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
” Furthermore the European Court has recognised in B v United Kingdom; P v United Kingdom that the Article 6 requirement to hold a public hearing was subject to exceptions [2001] 2 FLR 261 . [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm
United States but before Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
