Search for: "Supreme Court of New Mexico"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 4,052
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2014, 4:55 am
Lopez, 109 N.M. 578, 787 P.2d 1261 (New Mexico Supreme Court 1990). [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:36 am
LaFetra blogs over at Pacific Legal Foundation about a new case by the New Mexico Supreme Court, Rodriguez v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 11:24 am
New Mexico) ** In 2012, the Court labored to reach a majority, but could only achieve a four-one-four split on testimony during trial about a DNA report prepared by a lab analyst who did not appear. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:50 am
Deborah La Fetra at Pacific Legal on a case that arose against a shopping mall after a runaway car smashed through a floor-to-ceiling glass wall into a medical clinic: [On May 8,] the New Mexico Supreme Court decided in Rodriguez v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:00 am
” The HFN has appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
5 May 2014, 10:40 am
Last week, Nino penned one of his trademark blistering dissents denouncing regulatory overreach, only to have overreached himself by misstating the facts of a prior unanimous Supreme Court decision -- that he himself authored. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
Supreme Court, Case No. 12-1182. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm
Panama has an administrative court to handle all public contracting disputes. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 6:52 am
The Court on Monday granted review in two new cases; both will be decided next Term. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 3:30 am
The old court, renamed the Court of Existing Claims, still handles claims for injuries occurring before that date, and will do so until all those claims are resolved.But SB 1062 directed appeals of the court's rulings from cases before Feb. 1 to the new Workers’ Compensation Commission.The Supreme Court ruled in Carlock v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 7:28 am
Supreme Court ruling. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In his article for The New York Times "Room for Debate" feature on whether courts should eliminate human court reporters (spurred by the chaos caused by the recent resignation of a drug-addicted court reporter in New York), U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In his article for The New York Times "Room for Debate" feature on whether courts should eliminate human court reporters (spurred by the chaos caused by the recent resignation of a drug-addicted court reporter in New York), U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In his article for The New York Times "Room for Debate" feature on whether courts should eliminate human court reporters (spurred by the chaos caused by the recent resignation of a drug-addicted court reporter in New York), U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:48 am
In his article for The New York Times "Room for Debate" feature on whether courts should eliminate human court reporters (spurred by the chaos caused by the recent resignation of a drug-addicted court reporter in New York), U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
In so doing, the US Supreme Court said that it would not review the decision of the New Mexico Supreme Court that refusing to photograph the same-sex ceremony was a violation of New Mexico’s public accommodations law, which prevents discrimination by those who offer their services to the public. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 10:24 am
The New Mexico Supreme Court [official website] ruled on Monday that the state must recognize the tribal status of the Fort Sill Apache [official website]. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm
The enlarged pool of available photographers in New Mexico thus increases the potential for irony. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
Willock, in which the owners of a New Mexico photography business were asking the Court to review their claim that a requirement to photograph a same-sex couple’s commitment ceremony violated their First Amendment rights, Christopher Schmidt of ISCOTUSnow looks at earlier cases involving similar claims. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 6:55 pm
This was an issue of New Mexico law, and therefore not reviewable by the Supreme Court, but I think other courts would do well to draw a different line. [read post]
