Search for: "US v. Davis"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 4,721
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2010, 9:00 pm
Davis v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 11:26 am
In Enerfin Field Services v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:27 am
This initial pepper spray case, Nelson v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 5:30 am
“This dispute is about the purchase and sale of a parrot,” begins Davy v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:07 am
July 17, 2012) [Eric's Note: Sam Bayard is an associate at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP in New York. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 1:57 pm
March 7, 2022 – Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, a veteran owned law firm, gave the winning argument in Mycroft AI v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:28 am
Professor Josh Davis recently summed up the sentiments: “Twombly is a very confusing decision. [read post]
25 May 2008, 2:39 pm
At trial, the Insured argued that she suffered from a total disability as defined in the plan because she was unable to use her right hand following the incident. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
But because federal law requires that generic manufacturers use verbatim the labeling initially prepared by the inventor of the drug - here, Wyeth - plaintiff got a second bite at the apple against Wyeth, even though she indisputably never used Wyeth's drug, and Wyeth no longer even manufactured it. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
In the seminal McCulloch v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:54 am
Is this guy trying to match wits with Kim Davis over in Kentucky? [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
(Infodocket) ICYMI, Trump v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 1:30 pm
The plaintiffs are represented by EFF, Davis, Wright Tremaine LLP, Walters Law Group, and Daphne Keller. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 5:58 am
Their arguments (which anticipated those made in Brown v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
15 Aug 2015, 3:26 am
Afra Afsharipour, Professor of Law, UC Davis School of Law among several others. [read post]
