Search for: "United States v. Felt"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 2,646
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
United States, a case initially brought in state court and removed by the government to federal court, challenging the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 7:43 am
United Grain Growers Mr. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:48 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 5:11 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
., on the exception to the 4th Amendment's warrant requirement that encompasses searching the luggage - and laptops - of people entering or leaving the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 3:30 am
Legal Background on Sex Stereotyping Back in 1989, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the landmark case of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 7:36 am
The full brief of the United States is available here. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 3:52 pm
When the ambulance arrived, he said he felt fine and took a taxi. [read post]
31 May 2009, 11:17 pm
One of the problems was that the Sudanese South felt alienated by the largely Muslim-dominated government, which led to a civil war for over 20 years. [read post]
31 May 2009, 8:18 pm
One of the problems was that the Sudanese South felt alienated by the largely Muslim-dominated government, which led to a civil war for over 20 years. [read post]
29 May 2009, 8:09 am
Naaah...said the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 May 2009, 4:58 am
Patent 5,583,122, Teva Pharmaceuticals appealed to the US United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit claiming invalidity defenses of obviousness and obviousness-type double patenting. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
The policy pressured small states to comply - whether or not they felt it proper. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:34 pm
State, supra, 744 A.2d 864, 886-889; Lewis v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 9:15 pm
State v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:00 am
In Schwartzman v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:03 pm
Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:36 am
Here was the answer I was looking for:None of the decisions appearing in the first volume and most of the second volume of United States Reports are actually decisions of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
