Search for: "United States v. Place" Results 2341 - 2360 of 24,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2022, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
Rumsfeld discussed the government interest in the opening of Part III of the opinion, which was necessary given that the expressive conduct section applied United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:18 am
My plan is to be present for the oral arguments, and I [...]...US Supreme Court Grants Cert. in BilskiOn Monday, June 1, 2009, the United States Supreme Court granted cert. in Bilski v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 4:50 pm
  Notwithstanding,  that there are a good [...]...The History of Software PatentsSince the United States Supreme Court first addressed the patentability of computer software in Gottschalk v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm by Anthony Lake
The main opinion begins with the premise that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution "protects people, not places. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
On Saturday afternoon, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled unconstitutional the District’s absolute prohibition on the carrying of handguns outside the home for lawful self-defense, in the case of Palmer v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 5:02 pm
United States highlights the awkwardness of mootness doctrine itself. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 7:12 am by Zachary Spilman
”  (Dissent op. at 2) (citing United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2020, 5:20 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The rule of law, as observed in Roncarelli v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by John Bellinger
   The majority noted that “all relevant conduct took place outside the United States” and concluded that Chiquita’s status as a US corporation was insufficient to rebut the presumption against extraterritoriality in Kiobel. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 6:10 pm by Matt Cooper
Last week, in Texas League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]