Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2341 - 2360
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2011, 4:48 am
* * * * But elected benches are by nature glaringly "fishy" (i.e., "...dang, Nadine, the campaign money to the judge last year...just don't seem right...the dog don't hunt... [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:30 am
""[W]e don't want to be draconian," said the ranger, explaining why the county felt it was necessary to take this matter to trial, "but we [also] don't want people walking in a corridor of feces. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 11:14 am
And the defendants, our government, has arguments about the legality of the program that don't rely on secrets (but do rely on incorrect legal arguments). [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:32 am
I don't know how it will all turn out. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:30 pm
British agency that decides Holocaust era art claims: We can't help; we don't do thefts after 1945. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 11:57 pm
But now they've had enough time, and what they're proposing is a really disappointing combination of an official commentary that basically says "we don't want to change much, this is just about outliers, like some one-in-a-million kinds of exceptions" with a statute that suggests (more strongly than the early-September draft) to tailor the injunction rather than to deny one.Only telecommunications service providers like… [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:26 am
They don't have the luxury of saying, "Well, shucks, the odds here suck so he's got a better chance if we just don't do anything. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:14 pm
After all, police officers don't lie. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 6:10 am
We can't judge a lawyer by their clients — consider public defenders, the unsung guardians of liberty — but a lawyer is only as good as the causes he or she represents. [read post]
1 Aug 2024, 4:05 am
In Parents Defending Education v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
But we want to believe that they don't act on them. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
I don’t necessarily think that is a bad thing, because courts should not be influenced by such things. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:38 am
I don't know what they can and will do in Dusseldorf, but should my constitutional rights not be respected on Thursday, I will definitely seek advice from lawyers specialized in constitutional law. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 10:30 am
Moreover, their mental illness causes them to act in ways prisons don’t condone, often leading to their placement in solitary confinement. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 6:42 pm
That provision was actually cited in Roe, and I don't think Justice Alito affirmatively rejected those pearls of wisdom from Justice Blackmun. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
But still we don't have to like it. [read post]
2 Jun 2006, 10:11 am
Judges don't have to accept FRCrP 11c1c agreements. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
Hence, one might read Neagle as implicitly adopting a Supremacy Clause defense that is likewise deferential to federal authority.I don't read Neagle that way. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:20 am
If either of those things had happened, even we wouldn't consider arguing for preemption in this case.But they didn't. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
(If the NSA did not, in fact, surveille any of them, I can think of no good reason -- certainly not a so-called state secrets privilege -- why the agency could not inform the court of that fact.)To be sure, we don't know for certain which plaintiffs, or which clients, were surveilled. [read post]
