Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 2341 - 2360 of 6,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2020, 8:38 am by Florian Mueller
I don't know what they can and will do in Dusseldorf, but should my constitutional rights not be respected on Thursday, I will definitely seek advice from lawyers specialized in constitutional law. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 6:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We dont care what consumers think about the matter, because we dont trust them to give good answers to surveys, because surveys are unpredictable and could produce liability “for a wholly unanticipated claim the advertisement’s plain language would not support,” and the resulting “uninte [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
British agency that decides Holocaust era art claims: We can't help; we don't do thefts after 1945. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:33 pm
  We want to get each and every ruling right, don't we? [read post]
22 May 2010, 4:46 am by Rumpole
"You can't see the defendant. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:31 pm
By default, our cases will be assigned only to judges to whom we haven't contributed $2,500, that is, the good judges, the ones we like. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 8:01 am by Eric Goldman
They dont seem to care about whether defendant actually did the infringing, or about developing the law. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 3:03 pm
  Can we tell students that most of our Article III judges don't write their own opinions? [read post]
19 May 2011, 6:50 am
We've all seen it (if you haven't, I don't want to know you.) and love it. [read post]
As Cheney said at the hearing’s closing:  In our country, we dont swear an oath to an individual, or a political party. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 5:32 am by Rumpole
If you don't do this in, lets say Judge Bloom's division, then you're going to find yourself at a trial or sounding within a month of the arrest and forced to waive speedies. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 4:48 am by Dan
*   *   *   * But elected benches are by nature glaringly "fishy" (i.e., "...dang, Nadine, the campaign money to the judge last year...just don't seem right...the dog don't hunt... [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:47 am by Steve Vladeck
To similar effect is my friend Peter Margulies' post criticizing the majority and defending Judge Henderson's "pragmatic" analysis. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:10 pm by Florian Mueller
""By lowering the bar for non-obviousness, there's a real risk that patents will issue that don't deserve patent protection, that there will be additional litigation. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:04 am
Obama would be a fool to appoint extreme, left-wing judges, and I don't think he is a fool. [read post]