Search for: "v. JONES" Results 2341 - 2360 of 9,905
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s order [the case is Olivia de Havilland… [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:38 pm by Daniel Nazer
This test, from a California Supreme Court case called Comedy III Productions v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
  But the press is never entitled to use Mr Smith and Mr Jones as pawns in that debate – or, as Kant put it, as means to an end. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 9:47 am by Daniel Nathan
Fifth Circuit’s Decision The Fifth Circuit’s decision striking down the DOL’s Fiduciary Rule in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” EJI focuses on this week’s cert denial in Hidalgo v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” More details on the Anthem data breach case discussed earlier here, and Ted Frank’s role in calling it into question [Bob Dorigo Jones] Also, for those with access, Ted has written a piece for the Wall Street Journal on the need to rein in abuse of the cy pres doctrine in disbursing lawsuit proceeds, with a suitable vehicle on the horizon: A bipartisan coalition of 16 state attorneys general is also urging the Supreme Court to hear Frank v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 12:33 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Schecter, citing Clinton v Jones, 520 US 681 [Clinton], held that a sitting president is not immune from being sued in state courts for unofficial acts* and denied President Donald J. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:35 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lords Sumption and Lloyd-Jones give the lead judgments, with which Lords Mance, Hodge and Briggs agree. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:47 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Gustafson’s most high-profile litigation matter is her representation of the plaintiff in Young v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In his dissent from denial of cert earlier this year in Silvester v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:46 am by ASAD KHAN
For Lord Lloyd-Jones: As a matter of legal instinct, the proposition that the ability to exercise a lawful power to detain is a precondition to a power to grant bail seems entirely sound. [read post]