Search for: "Alls v. Alls"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 190,897
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"[Respondent] is vested with the exclusive authority to determine all applications for retirement benefits and the determination must be upheld if the interpretation of the controlling retirement statute is reasonable and the underlying factual findings are supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Tamucci v DiNapoli, 133 AD3d 960, 961 [3d Dept 2015] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citations omitted]; see Matter of Sawma v DiNapoli, 139 AD3d… [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:01 am
(Parisi v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
But all of my counts are premised on the actual number of arguments. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
”When the defendant doctors and hospital sought to compel the “unrestricted” release of “mental health, drug/alcohol treatment and HIV-related records,” that request was granted by the Bronx County Supreme Court.On appeal, the Appellate Division, First Department, noted that the defendants had failed to establish a “particularized need” for all that information, and thought the defendants were only entitled to records relating “to the left hip… [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
In State of Tennessee v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
See Maia v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
Practical Guidance is committed to amplifying diverse voices of attorneys across all differences, including gender and race. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
The Labour party is proposing to strengthen the protections for all workers with regard to TUPE and so it would seem unlikely that they would proceed with the first clarification. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 2:30 am
With the Euros kicking off on 14 June, people all over the UK and Europe are discussing strikers. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:09 pm
Alejandro Mayorkas, et al. and Pars Equality Center, et al. v. [read post]
Supreme Court Hands a Blow to Small-Business Succession Planning in Connelly v. U.S., by Sam Sturgis
17 Jun 2024, 1:45 pm
On June 6, 2024, the United States Supreme Court held in Connelly v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 1:38 pm
§ 405(a); Norma Ribbon & Trimming, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 12:46 pm
That is what happened here.The case is Doe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:25 am
From Thursday's decision by Judge David Larimer in Carey v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
"Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am
"Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 10:33 am
Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 10:03 am
Story on @nbc6 starting at noon. pic.twitter.com/ybgWz1tGJb— Ari Odzer (@ariodzernbc6) June 17, 2024In an unrelated update, the Supreme Court granted cert today in another fraud case, Kousisis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:46 am
Garcia Cortes v. [read post]