Search for: "Black v. United States"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 4,858
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2017, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:08 am
First, it may be the best statement of Legal Realism in the United States Reports. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:35 pm
United States, Virginia v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 2:54 am
Brian Pringle sued the band members in 2010, claiming the Black Eyed Peas had ripped off elements of a dance version of his 1999 song "Take a Dive. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm
United States, a recent decision of the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 10:00 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:43 am
JUDGE GRIESA 11 CV 2472 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Jonathan Tasini, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 6:00 am
But they made what seemed like a safe bet at the time—that the arc of history would lead to a permanent progressive majority on the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
Maryland and Giglio v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
United StatesDocket: 09-1554Issue(s): 1) Whether the Supreme Court's decision in Yeager v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 9:01 pm
I was lead counsel in Rasul v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm
Leading scholars will offer brief reflections on the long history of black freedom movements, their significance to United States history more generally, and their relevance for today. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
The three-judge panel there held that, in light of the Supreme Court’s decision last summer in United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:14 pm
United States (2010), Carr v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
With apologies for citation format, then:“Presumptions must be carefully scrutinized before they will be allowed to operate against an accused since there is a real and substantial possibility that they will conflict with the overriding, more fundamental presumption of innocence accorded to every defendant” (Leary v United States, 395 US 6). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
With apologies for citation format, then:“Presumptions must be carefully scrutinized before they will be allowed to operate against an accused since there is a real and substantial possibility that they will conflict with the overriding, more fundamental presumption of innocence accorded to every defendant” (Leary v United States, 395 US 6). [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 4:22 am
On the surface, this would appear to be a flagrant violation of the Equal Protection Clause if it happened in the United States. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
This aligns with the well-settled law in the United States. [read post]
