Search for: "Brown v. Brown" Results 2361 - 2380 of 12,716
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
Supreme Court announced its decisions in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
The week wraps up with continuing coverage of this week’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
I usually say that this sort of an explanation may well be correct as a causal account and should certainly inform the giving of legal advice and litigation strategy, but that you can't put it in your brief.And sure enough, the briefs in Brown v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 9:28 am
But, in the rarefied atmosphere of attorneys' fees litigation and in light of this Court's divided decision in New Jersey v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:40 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Thursday morning read: John Roberts takes center stage in the battle over student loan forgiveness (Joan Biskupic, CNN) Why Ketanji Brown Jackson Split With the Court’s Liberals in a 5–4 Decision (Mark Joseph Stern, Slate) SCOTUS Predictions Based on Lower Court Judges (Adam Feldman, Empirical SCOTUS) The Amendment the Court Forgot in Twitter v. [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 10:26 am
Let's implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK (No2), which decided that disenfranchisement of convicted prisoners breached their human rights. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
[Federalist Society SCOTUS Brief video with Jay Schweikert on Ramos v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am by Matthew Ryder QC, Matrix
Lord Phillips, Lord Brown and Lord Dyson all analysed the cases concerning Austrian judgements alongside another strand of ECtHR authority relating to cases from Norway Ringvold v Norway (Application No. 34964/97) and Y v Norway (2003) 41 EHRR 87. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 10:13 am
He criticized his predecessors, who defended the discriminatory laws at issue in Brown v. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 10:13 am by Christine Corcos
He criticized his predecessors, who defended the discriminatory laws at issue in Brown v. [read post]