Search for: "California v. Texas"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
(I'm not taking a position on the controversial question of statehood here), Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah (submitter), Vermont, and Washington.All of the most populous states except California--which might still support Epic,… [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:31 am
The defendants would like to escape her jurisdiction by means of a transfer to the Northern District of Texas, and Continental's motion for an antisuit injunction has been fully briefed (in other posts I discussed Nokia's German anti-antisuit injunction and Continental's reply brief, which mentions five German Sharp v. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 3:44 pm
Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 1:31 pm
Hellerstedt, a 2016 decision involving Texas abortion regulations. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
” In fact, people in red states like Texas should want to consider the NPV plan, since under the current system predictably red states get ignored in the election campaign just as surely as predictably blue states do. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Title: Alford v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
Previously, Cicchetti held academic positions at the University of Southern California, and the Energy and Environmental Policy Center at Harvard University’s John F. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
Previously, Cicchetti held academic positions at the University of Southern California, and the Energy and Environmental Policy Center at Harvard University’s John F. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:40 pm
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp (Docket Report) District Court C D California: Advertising-based content distribution patent fails Bilski test: Ultramercial, LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:24 am
Texas v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:06 am
Texas)). (8) 90/011,665 (electronically filed) – U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio ‘pay to play’ law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright – Decisions District Court N D California decision… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
: iLor v Google (ISinIP) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Princo - Misuse of a patent pool: En banc Federal Circuit to decide whether CD-R/RW patentees improperly sequestered alternative technologies: Princo Corp v ITC (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) US Copyright Radio 'pay to play' law ready for vote in House, Senate (Ars Technica) US Copyright - Decisions District Court N D California decision in Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Arkanoc Solutions, Inc… [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 12:56 am
Clancy v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:01 am
Texas, was more appropriate in this case. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:36 am
Sometimes, though, the matter is indeed controversial, as in Texas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 10:11 am
Kentucky v. [read post]
