Search for: "Case v. People"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 51,974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2012, 10:59 pm
This is because stories about particular individuals are simply much more attractive to readers than stories about unidentified people. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 1:47 am
The case can be contrasted with the decision of the Spanish Supreme Court in A and B v Ediciones El Pais (see my case comment here) – in which an order removing names from the online article was overturned. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:04 pm
Bradley v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:04 am
After Nokia brought its infringement cases against OPPO in multiple jurisdictions, OPPO raised various FRAND issues with the No. 1 Intermediate People's Court of Chongqing Municipality of the People's Republic of China, with the ultimate objective of obtaining a global portfolio license on terms to be set by the Chongqing court.At first sight, the outcome is simply consistent with the UK Supreme Court's jurisdictional decisions in Unwired Planet v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 9:21 am
Case Citation: Thompson v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
In McComsey v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:13 am
In Bass v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 11:01 pm
Under the 1996 case of People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 8:56 am
None of this is central to the case. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 11:25 am
Except what went wrong was (1) real life isn't a video game, (2) the employees at the random business -- a Days Inn -- only had $2, (3) Henning forgot to set the parking brake on his car (another downside of hallucinogens), so in the middle of the robbery he saw his car rolling down the inclined driveway and ran outside to stop it, (4) at which point an off-duty detective driving his car on an errand saw Henning, complete with black ski mask and sawed-off shotgun, run outside of the lobby and… [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 1:37 pm
Including it is just a matter of whether you want to be especially nice or mean, and I don't think it unusual that, as time passes, and initial tempers flare, one may tend to become a little more of the former and a little less of the latter.)I guess the only downside is that we now can't cite a clear case for the proposition that not every statement in a published opinion is a holding! [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 1:58 pm
The two cases are night and day. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 11:47 am
He highlighted the weaknesses in the prosecution's case, challenged the veracity of the prosecution's witnesses, and offered a viable alternative to the prosecution's theory. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
(This seems a quite reasonable assumption given the facts of this particular case, by the way.) [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am
The book has been compared to other classics that provide a definitive account of other landmark cases: Anthony Lewis’ Gideon’s Trumpet (Gideon v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:46 am
Well, armed with these jury instructions, they did what most people seem to do when faced with the dark art of calculating patent infringement damages: they stuck their nine figures in the air, filled out a form, and came up with a number... [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 4:52 am
This case involves a lot of people and firms that I really don’t... [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:19 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:40 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
7 May 2016, 12:27 am
However, he contended that reading Article 293 and Article 32 of the Criminal Code in light of Article 10 principles meant that there was sufficient public interest in the case, affecting people in a small geographical area, to justify the publication of the article by a professional journalist. [read post]
