Search for: "Doe v. Delaware" Results 2361 - 2380 of 3,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Glimp at Medcor Remote medical support may hold down WC costs, but it does invite some interesting circumstances. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:43 am
Hence, a recent (and perhaps significant) pronouncement of the Delaware Chancery Court in Martin Marietta Materials Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  Yet in the Delaware courts, that does not seem to be the case. [read post]
9 May 2012, 6:17 am by Rob Robinson
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.Follow @InfoGovernance   eDiscovery News Content and Considerations A Critique of Delaware District Court’s Revised Default eDiscovery Standard - bit.ly/JQOdMV (Christopher Spizzirri) Combatting Bias in Predictive Coding Adoption: In… [read post]
7 May 2012, 2:11 pm by Francis Pileggi
  The Court distinguished the decision in Delaware of Open MRI Radiology Associates, P.A. v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:50 pm
 I have tried to get the opinion from the Chancery Court's website but it does not appear to be available yet, so I am relying on the various media reports of this significant opinion. [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:52 pm by Francis Pileggi
As a practical matter, now that we’ve put the old ultra vires doctrine to bed, when does corporate purpose ever arise as a matter of law? [read post]
6 May 2012, 6:51 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
For Delaware, as far as I can tell, only one trial court has ever addressed the issue, and it applied the firefighter’s rule. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The defendants' counsel submitted a letter citing a Delaware Chancery Court decision, R&R Capital, LLC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
The defendants' counsel submitted a letter citing a Delaware Chancery Court decision, R&R Capital, LLCĀ v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm by Kevin F. Brady
Although NOERS may have chosen rationally, from its perspective, the lesser of two evils, the marginal market premium NOERS obtained does not necessarily reflect acquiescence in the approximately $8 Merger price or negate or resolve the concerns of inevitability that animate the controlling shareholder cases…. [read post]