Search for: "Does 1 through 500" Results 2361 - 2380 of 2,819
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2010, 6:00 am
If present in food, it does not usually affect the taste, smell, or appearance of the food. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 10:04 am
Nevertheless, a lot of work goes into the crafting and placing of a gargoyle, and no less is true of the Church's budget: it does not, like Athena, spring fully formed and functional out of the deputies' heads gathered at General Convention. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Well, eliminating that kind of mutual ignorance is one of the things that this blog’s all about, so we thought we’d take a look at how §2 of the Third Restatement is faring these days.We see three important issues wrapped up in the Third Restatement – these being, (1) risk/utility balancing as the basic means of assessing liability, (2) the requirement of a feasible alternative design, and (3) employment of negligence-based “reasonableness" as the test. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 2:00 am
Q: It doesn’t sound like a very good ROI to have 1/500 answers turn into a client. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 1:41 pm
Some animals, requiring identification pursuant to Part XV of the Health of Animals Regulations, may never be tagged, through neglect or opposition to the present regulatory scheme. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
These ownership and holding period thresholds represent a departure from the June 2009 proposal, which called for scaled ownership requirements of 1%, 3% and 5% based on company size and a 1-year holding period. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Cian Murphy
Earlier this month the UN announced that on foot of the review of over 500 listed individuals and entities, 45 individuals were being delisted. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:34 am
About 500 to 1,000 or 31% of all food-related deaths are caused by Salmonella infections each year. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Anything v. a Fortune 500 company = fair use less likely. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:15 am by admin
  This is a threshold determination that can affect whether a spouse is entitled to support, but that should not affect the duration or amount of support, which should be decided according to the factors numbered 1 through 13 in §20-107.3(E). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:31 pm by Danielle Citron
It is not net neutrality but would instead authorize net neutrality violations through a loophole. [read post]