Search for: "Does 1-58"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 2,966
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Section 3(1) establishes a civil cause of action: “(1) An actual or apprehended breach of section 1(1) may be the subject of a claim in civil proceedings by the person who is or may be the victim of the course of conduct in question. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
I have looked at the following issues: 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 9:55 am
§§ 6(a)(1) and (6), 88 Stat. 58, 60, 29 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
It does not follow that the advice has to be accepted or followed nor for that matter, for the advice to be correct. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
”[1] A number of recent, post-Frye[2] Board decisions start with this statement, or a similar allocation of burden of proof. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 3:36 pm
The picture to the right shows that out of California's 58 counties, only 3 voted against Prop 13. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006] HCA 46 (28 September 2006)), Canada (Champagne v… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:46 am
Cooper, supra, 99 N.J. at 57-58. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 8:58 am
The defense is that (1) the MSA is not a compact requiring congressional approval under the leading modern case, Parker v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 8:32 pm
This statutory restriction does not bar behind the scenes advice to a client. 18 U.S.C. 207(c)(1), which imposes a one-year prohibition on communications by former senior Executive Branch officials to their former department when those communications are knowingly made with the intent to influence the department ‘in connection with any matter on which such persons seeks official action by any officer or employee of such department. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:34 pm
If you would support Congress blocking the EPA, press 1. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:57 am
DOE, Department of Interior Announce Offshore Wind InitiativesDOE and the U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 2:58 am
Canada (Attorney General) 2011 FC 58 (Trade Mark Blog) (IPblog) Who must show consent in an intellectual property infringement case? [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 1:59 am
During this time, there were 32 reported cheese-associated outbreaks and 58 deaths, but the authors conclude that "If current Food and Drug Administration sanitary requirements for cheesemaking had been met, these outbreaks would have been preventable. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Union of India & Others AIR 1987 SC 1086, this Court observed that Article 32 does not merely confer power on this Court to issue direction, order or writ for the enforcement of fundamental rights. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:50 am
In the meantime, we'll see what the court does with the statute, but I'm highly skeptical of its viability. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:35 am
There was no Notice of Claim filed with the county as required by Section 58-e of the General Municipal Law. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 12:42 pm
(i) Necessity[89] The principle of necessity does not mean that the hearsay evidence must be necessary in order for a party to prove his or her case. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
Beverly Hills, CA, US 90210 Telephone: +1 (310) 275-6664 Fax: +1 (310) 550-1856 aldenlaw@yahoo.com Dennis Moore, Attorney at Law 5041 La Mart Dr., Ste 230 Riverside, CA 92507 (951) 660-5289 Fax: (951) 340-3276 Mandelman out. ~~~ Filed 1/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE CLAUDIA JACQUELINE ACEVES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
23 Fed Sentencing Rep 1 ()ct., 2010). [read post]
