Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2023, 12:35 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:48 am
On 13 October 2014, the Supreme Court heard the case of Al-Saud v Apex Global Management, which considered the appeal of various related interim orders stemming from a Saudi Prince’s refusal to comply with a personal signature order. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 5:12 pm
EVOLVING STORY: Leandra-English-v-Mulvaney-and-President-Trump-CFPB-Leadership-Fight (injunction suit docket) 12/27/17NCSLT as an original creditor? [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 4:29 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 5:41 am
Question of defendant's ability to consent because he could not speak English was moot. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 8:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 8:22 pm
In Romania, the “u” at the end of the name is the same as “son” in English. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Nehaj v Okolita Inc, 2013 SKQB 195 [1] Matthew Lorne Nehaj (the “Bankrupt”) filed an assignment in bankruptcy on November 14, 2011. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
Be In v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:45 pm
The High Court delivered its judgment yesterday in Wheeler v Office of Prime Minister dismissing the application for judicial review of the decision not to hold a referendum. [read post]
9 May 2025, 6:45 am
Following the UK Supreme Court’s decision in Unwired Planet v Huawei, the English courts confirmed their jurisdiction to determine global FRAND licence terms. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 2:15 am
The decision means that debate about the merits of the English Court of Appeal decision in Richardson v Pitt-Stanley [1995] QB 123 have been put to bed once and for all. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, stating that the criminal standard of proof was not required for confiscation, and that the English court was entitled to consider evidence which formed the basis of a previous charge against the appellants in Portugal as there was no link between the proceedings. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:44 am
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal, stating that the criminal standard of proof was not required for confiscation, and that the English court was entitled to consider evidence which formed the basis of a previous charge against the appellants in Portugal as there was no link between the proceedings. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:18 am
v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court holds that Ukraine is a legal person with full capacity in English law. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 4:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 6:42 am
In Persimmon Homes Ltd v Great Lakes Reinsurance (UK) Plc [2010] EWHC 1705 (Comm), the High Court ruled that dishonesty on the part of a claimant which has taken out after the event (ATE) insurance can amount to a material non-disclosure such that the insurer may avoid the policy.Persimmon Homes Ltd (Persimmon) was the defendant in litigation with another property development company, CPH. [read post]
