Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2022, 7:37 pm
Marshall, 547 U.S. 293, 308 (2006) (noting that "the equity juris- diction conferred by the Judiciary Act of 1789 . . . is that of the English Court of Chancery in 1789" (quoting Markham v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 10:28 am
The reputation of the English court as a tough forum in which to obtain an interim injunction has been underlined by Pat Treacy (sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court) in Planet Art LLC and Anor v Photobox Limited and Anor [2019] EWHC 1688 (Ch) (judgment not yet widely available).BackgroundPlanet Art and Photobox are commercial rivals. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:30 pm
(Final post in IntLawGrrls' 3-part preview series on an ICC hearing set for this week in the sole case so far charged in the Central African Republic referral.)With the International Criminal Court set to begin a 3-day confirmation-of-charges hearing in Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 9:09 am
Youming Jin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 7:38 am
Biden v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 5:58 am
Custodio v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Morland-Jones v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Each Wednesday we tell you which three English-language cases and which French-language case have been the most viewed* on CanLII and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Leggat v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 12:22 pm
See Russell v. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Michael Knapp shared news that defendants in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 3:26 am
Brian Cordery and Emma MunceyLast year, Actavis, Teva and Mylan (“Actavis”) sought revocation in the English Patents Court of two patents relating to tadalafil, which is sold by Eli Lilly (“Lilly”) as the active ingredient in CIALIS® to treat erectile dysfunction and pulmonary arterial hypertension. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
In Kahler v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 6:00 pm
English) influence. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
In a unanimous opinion delivered yesterday (here) in NLRB v. [read post]
