Search for: "Franks v. Franks" Results 2361 - 2380 of 6,551
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 7:54 am by Don Cruse
Williamson County, et al., No. 10-0671 In re Frank Kent Motor Co. d/b/a Frank Kent Cadillac, No. 10-0687 Jack Edward Milner v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:25 am
Proxy Season Half-Time Update Posted by John Roe, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc., on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Disclosure, ESG, Executive Compensation, Institutional Investors, Say on frequency, Say on pay, Shareholder proposals, Shareholder voting, Sustainability What’s (Still) Wrong with Credit Ratings Posted by Frank Partnoy, University of San Diego, on Wednesday, May 31, 2017 Tags: Accountability, Credit risk, Defaults, Dodd-Frank… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 8:25 am by pmiller
” The prize winners, selected by Wagner himself, include Edan Shertzer, Colin O’Regan, and Eric Johnson, who won First Prize for their preview of Janus Capital Group, et al. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 1:42 am
Last month's order by Mr Justice Newey in The Hedgehog Golf Company Ltd v Frank Hauser [2011] EWHC 689 (Ch), in the Chancery Division for England and Wales, was one such instance. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
AFSCME to recognize public employees’ First Amendment rights against forced union agency fees [Shapiro, Trevor Burrus, and Aaron Barnes] More: Shapiro and Frank Garrison, National Review; Cato Podcast with Jacob Huebert and Caleb Brown; Silvester v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and anor, heard 20 – 29 February 2012. [read post]
28 May 2016, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
The proportionality of interference with those rights is ultimately a matter for the Court … but the Court cannot simply substitute its own decision for that of the primary decision-maker or frank the decision without itself considering it. [read post]