Search for: "HEAD v. CALIFORNIA" Results 2361 - 2380 of 2,908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
In California, the city of Hayward settled a case for $1.5 million when an off-leash police dog, searching for a suspect, mistakenly attacked a man sleeping under a bush. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
In California, the city of Hayward settled a case for $1.5 million when an off-leash police dog, searching for a suspect, mistakenly attacked a man sleeping under a bush. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
At BlawgIT, Brett Trout writes about the AMP v. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Courts have often expressed—as the Supreme Court did in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:52 pm by firemarkVA
Lawsuit: CrossFit later sued Alvies for trademark (and not copyright) infringement in the Northern District of California. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  At the conclusion of the season, head line coach Al Thomas decided to step down. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:07 am by AstuteLegalVideos.com
See: Peter Dale Scott & Jonathan Marshall, Cocaine Politics: Drugs, Armies, and the CIA in Central America, University of California Press, Berkley and Los Angeles, California, 1998. pp. 76-77. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:32 am by Stephen Sachs
The oral argument transcript in California v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 5:56 pm by RHP
In California, the city of Hayward settled a case for $1.5 million when an off-leash police dog, searching for a suspect, mistakenly attacked a man sleeping under a bush. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am by Eric Goldman
I believe this is the FTC’s first foray into keyword advertising issues, and it’s left some folks scratching their heads. [read post]