Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 2361 - 2380 of 16,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2018, 5:57 am by William Ford
Sharon Bradford Franklin explained how United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 3:44 am
 In the aftermath of Edwards v Cook, a number of patentees have successfully deployed creative arguments to avoid falling foul of an “Edwards v Cook”-style attack. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Robert Brammer
We hope you can join us, online, for our Constitution Day event on September 14th, 2023, at 3 p.m. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am by Eric Goldman
First Amendment: Restrictions on Protected Speech The court thinks that the law is likely to be subject to strict scrutiny because it’s both a speaker-based and content-based restriction: On its face, the Act distinguishes between different websites—exempting some and targeting others—and therefore, appears speaker-based….The Act’s exemption of “widely recognized” “media outlets” and product review sites bolsters this conclusion…… [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am by CMS
She confirms that the court hopes to give its decision early next week and adjourns proceedings. 1515: Lord Pannick QC ends his submissions. 1512: Lord Pannick QC sums up that if the court makes a declaration that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful then it would be for Parliament to reconvene and for them to decide what to do next. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:46 am by CMS
  On 9 November 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in Harpur Trust v Brazel. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:35 am by Cameron Kerry, Christopher Eiswerth
Sidley Austin hopes this report will provides a basis for further informed discussions of the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:09 am by centerforartlaw
Hubert stated in the 1990s that curators and museum officials would ask about his health, waiting for him to die in the hopes of inheriting his renowned collection.[36] His life has proven that a love of collecting can result in greed. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 3:14 pm
In the back and forth battle between companies and former employees regarding the confidential nature of customer information, the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska has just issued a decision of note in Softchoice Corp. v. [read post]