Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 2361 - 2380 of 14,942
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 7:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Virginia that prosecutors hope will overturn the Melendez-Diaz case from last term requiring confrontation for testimony by crime lab workers. [read post]
Also of interest in this case is the court’s reference to Lord Sumption’s judgment in Zakrzewski v District Court in Torun, Poland [2013] UKSC 2, which stated that “as a general rule the court of the executing state is bound to take the statements and information in the warrant at face value. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Jareb Gleckel
In addition to striking down a burdensome abortion law, the opinion offers hope that, under the same stare decisis principles, the Chief would not vote to overrule Roe and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 7:25 pm
In Los Angeles Superior Court this month, photographer Larry Birkhead filed a paternity lawsuit demanding that Anna Nicole Smith return to the United States with her one-month-old daughter Dannielynn Hope Marshall Stern. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 2:03 pm by Sandy Levinson
  So, understandably, some people believe that states could limit the agenda of an Article V convention. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 9:05 am
Emergency Appeal: As it did in TiVo v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am by Amy Howe
The case decided by the court on Monday, Edwards v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 12:12 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
  SLAM's latest motion and memorandum to the Missouri federal court in the forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:14 pm
Yesterday, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
Depending on which side of the aisle you stand, you may revel in the audacity of hope, or just simply marvel at the audacity of your political opponents. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
But whatever quantum of deference one thinks appropriate, that should not vary based on the ostensible distinction between new rules and new applications of old rules.As I hope my critique of both Wright v. [read post]