Search for: "House v. House"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 41,216
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The House of Lords Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee (“SLSC”) has identified a re-attempt by the Government to amend the Public Order Act 1986 to lower the threshold for police intervention in respect of protests that was already rejected in January 2023 in the Public Order Bill—now the Public Order Act 2023. [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:12 pm
I wrote about the case of V.J.F v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
[3] Rutledge v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:53 am
Reasons for delay could include an attempt to harden the public company disclosures against an expected legal challenge, to attempt some degree of convergence with similar European rules, to reconsider key aspects of the proposal such as whether to mandate Scope 3 greenhouse gas (GHG) disclosures, to align the effectiveness and compliance dates for at least three interrelated ESG proposals, or to finish reviewing the many thousands of public comment letters received (the most recent comment letter… [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am
House of Representatives conflicts with the Voting Rights Act’s Section 2, which bans racial discrimination in voting policies.Moore v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
Things are becoming ever more fraught, and it is neither too early nor too late to reassess the pros and cons of the present strategy.But even if the White House decides to stick this out, the President will still be able to do the right thing by paying the country’s bills in full and on time, which will require him finally to say without qualifications that the debt ceiling law must give way to the Constitution. [read post]
21 May 2023, 3:39 pm
On May 17, 2020, the California Supreme Court granted review of the First District Court of Appeal’s controversial and much criticized published decision in Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
21 May 2023, 10:47 am
Case citation: Athos Overseas Ltd v. [read post]
20 May 2023, 3:07 am
Yezhov and Others v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:29 pm
State v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:40 pm
Mazo v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 9:11 am
The Chevron v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 6:30 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am
He favorably quotes Justice Scalia's memorable statement from Bendix Autolite Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 2:00 am
”I hope this outcome didn’t dog her.# # #DECISIONF. v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:21 pm
Twitter, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 1:01 pm
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:42 am
Four cases in the House of Lords or Supreme Court’ at [17] ff. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:17 am
My best guess is that this is preparatory to regulations that will address ‘rent to rent’ set ups, after Rakusen v Jepsen. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
She routinely provided inaccurate information regarding her clients and their housing assignments, needed constant reminders, and was ill-prepared for meetings (Tr. 18). [read post]
