Search for: "IN RE OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF DECISIONS"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 7,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 6:04 am
Instead, it "implicitly invites the plaintiff to re-plead. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 10:47 am
The presumption of regularity refers to a collection of deference doctrines by which courts presume that government officials “have properly discharged their official duties” in the course of making decisions—that they’ve acted with proper motives, haven’t lied and have generally comported themselves as ethical professionals. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
” DECISIONS Univ. of Maine Ordered to Restore Wetlands at Orono Campus. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 9:35 am
” DECISIONS Univ. of Maine Ordered to Restore Wetlands at Orono Campus. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 9:39 am
Recording Public Servants in Public Settings Various court decisions across the United States support the protection to record police activities in public spaces. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
"We're still actively engaged in discussions," he said. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 5:29 pm
It argues that although In re Gault was indeed a foundational legal holding, it did not translate into effective policy due in part to local officials’ failure to implement the decision as expected and lawmakers’ inability to enact legislation that was true to the spirit of Gault. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
When studies are done, they’re usually so inadequate from a methodological perspective that we can’t reach any firm comparative conclusions. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:30 pm
Here, we're not convinced the public has much interest in the redacted parts of the declaration (as distinct from the information that has already been disclosed) and we see serious national security concerns with ordering disclosure. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
On April 27, 2010, the RS issued a decision rejecting all the applicant’s requests. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
Our position can be summarized in a single sentence: Where one public official act is traded for another public official act, there has not been any illegal conduct. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
As Sir Thomas Bingham MR said, this would be in the interests of the protection of patients, the protection of doctors, the reassurance of the patients’ families and the reassurance of the public. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
"Findlaw summaries [may] include opoinions that have not yet been released for publication and may be subject to modification, correction or withdrawl U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, August 12, 2008 Naser Jewelers, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Res. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
According to the NCC’s count, eleven outbreaks associated with these products have been investigated by public health officials since 1998. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:45 am
Briefs (in which each side presents proposed conclusions) are due June 15 (plaintiffs) and July 15 (defendants), then the Court will eventually issue a decision. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:47 pm
To date, no official written statement has been issued by the White House on this decision. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:31 am
Cash on the barrelhead to high billing associates at the Legal Times, SoCal 2L raises the bar on public service, Leaving the evergreen forest at Software Licensing Blog, Robots inventions and patent rights at Patent Baristas, How to describe a catch-22 at Likelihood of Confusion, Interviews with ADR giants at the Mediation Channel, Making a decision? [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 9:30 pm
"We're pleased," Crenshaw says. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
In 1832, Jackson vetoed a congressional move to re-charter the bank; the Whig-controlled Senate and Clay asked Jackson to supply notes from his Cabinet meeting about the veto decision and Jackson refused to supply the documents. [read post]
