Search for: "In re Sullivan "
Results 2361 - 2380
of 2,485
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2007, 9:43 am
Currently, we're around 380 ppm. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 5:12 pm
Did Sullivan & Cromwell chairman H. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 4:07 pm
Because they're portraying Alberto Gonzales and his deputy Paul J McNulty like figures out of a play by Bertolt Brecht. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 12:30 pm
In case you're curious, we believe that this individual is the associate who resigned last week. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 8:24 am
At that point Earnest filed a postconviction challenge in state court (represented by Tom Sullivan, now at Arkansas-Little Rock). [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:24 pm
The Law Blog spoke with Alan Sullivan, managing partner of Snell & Wilmer’s Salt Lake City office, who said that his law firm took responsibility for the improperly dated court filings. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:44 am
According to Indiana Supreme Court Justice Frank Sullivan Jr., more than 1.5 million cases are filed in Indiana courts each year. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 4:42 pm
If it reaches levels approaching that of the Intifada, we're in deep trouble. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 4:01 pm
In Charney's discrimination/retaliation case against Sullivan & Cromwell, Charney's attorneys have filed an opposition to Sullivan & Cromwell's motion to dismiss Charney's case. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 7:30 am
As gossip bloggers, we're big believers in the "it ain't confidential if it's already out there" rule. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 10:46 pm
Plaintiffs' brief, citing to Judge Eugene Pigott -- who had been one of the presiding justices that formulated the rules and has now been elevated to New York's Court of Appeals -- conceded that the rules were not intended to be applied uniformly:Indeed, Justice Pigott, in his public comments about the rules, acknowledged that the presiding justices had not considered how some of the rules would be applied to "the big firms in New York," noting that "[w]e're… [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:03 pm
" The most recent example is Danny Sullivan's post on SEO, which got Dugg and then was eliminated when anti-SEO Digg users flagged it as spam. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 7:21 am
Yes, you're remembering correctly. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 7:07 am
" The "we're not homophobes, just a**holes" line of defense probably won't do wonders for S&C's recruiting this fall. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 11:03 am
Sullivan & Cromwell (scroll down) [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
Sullivan raises the question: Isn't this Lochner? [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 7:44 am
But still, we're curious. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 10:26 pm
But it's always best just to expose ugliness and dishonesty, not punish it.Did Sullivan call writers who work for politicians whores? [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 11:24 am
"It goes beyond thinking the world's a meritocracy," he says, "to thinking you're entitled to something because of your own merits. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:48 pm
Sullivan-type protection, if it does? [read post]
