Search for: "JORDAN v. JORDAN"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 2,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Steiker & Jordan M. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 5:14 am
” Jordan v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:39 am
A4235
Ortiz (MS) -- Lowers the per se intoxication level blood alcohol content to .06 percent blood alcohol content; repealer No Same asBLURB : V & T L. lower BAC levels Last Act: 03/11/09 enacting clause strickenA4516A
Weinstein (MS) -- Relates to the accrual of merit time by certain inmates No Same asBLURB : Cor. merit time allowances Last Act: 03/11/09 amend and recommit to correction03/11/09 print number 4516aA6664
Hooper --… [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
(Think of Jordan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:35 pm
He claimed that they were taken because he was a Mormon after a Texas raid on and FLDS complex that led to removal of children.In Jordan v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:01 pm
Lin-Zheng v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 8:30 pm
Liu v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 7:40 pm
Perez-Mirachal v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 7:30 pm
Nyakatura v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:39 am
And now, there's published evidence that confirms that a Utah trial court has found them problematic, and an appelate court won't review that decision, at least for now.The case, McQueen v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:21 pm
(And A Round-Up) (2/23/09)Photo credit: Jordan Husney (via Flickr) [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 3:22 pm
In 2007, the Supreme Court of Oregon decided a case called Clarke v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:46 am
The Lords today have ruled today, unanimously, in RB (Algeria) and OO (Jordan) v Home Secretary that Algerian terror suspects and the Jordanian Abu Qatada can lawfully be deported to their home countries; to do so would not breach the Article 3 Convention right not to be tortured because the UK can properly rely on the assurances made by Algeria and Jordan that they will not be mistreated. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 2:36 am
RB (Algeria) (FC) and another (Appellants) v Secretary of State for the Home Department OO (Jordan) (Original Respondent and Cross-appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Original Appellant and Cross-respondent) [2009] UKHL 10 (18 February 2009) Mitchell (AP) and another (Original Respondents and Cross-appellants) v Glasgow City Council (Original Appellant and Cross-respondents) (Scotland) [2009] UKHL [...] [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 9:21 pm
His lawyers today filed a motion for emergency relief in the case of Khan Tumani v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 6:36 am
In Fields v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:23 pm
Actually, the case, Crawford v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:05 pm
In 2007, many of the restrictions had been struck down by a federal judge in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 9:06 am
Additional similar requests are expected.Even with a sea change in administration policies expected, NOW will still hold its annual Roe v. [read post]
