Search for: "LEWIS v. STATE" Results 2361 - 2380 of 3,692
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2009, 2:45 pm
Judge Jacobson concludes that Lakia is correct: "Both sides in this case have cited the seminal New Jersey decision that led to the adoption of the civil union statute and that of course is Lewis v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
In a press release, the Met stated that the arrests were for affray, public order offenses, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:40 am by azatty
  Most recently, last December, Mary argued before the nation’s highest court the case of Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 2:55 am by NCC Staff
Bork’s opponents were critical of his opinions about the Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 12:04 pm by Josh Blackman
The Supreme Court recently explained that such an official capacity suit would "require action by the sovereign or disturb the sovereign's property.'" Lewis v. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 1:05 am by INFORRM
The draft regulation is now under debate in the Council of States. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:42 pm by Erin E. Dardis
On February 12, 2015, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Sanislo v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-9411; Lewis v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
United States, 11-6364, Lewis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments Nagi v Sinniah Santhiramoulesan, heard 22 and 23 January 2024 (Collins Rice J) Sinton v Maybourne Hotels Limited, heard 19 and 20 December 2023 (Chamberlain J) Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Wilson v Mendelsohn and others, heard 4 to 8 December 2023 (HHJ… [read post]
21 May 2018, 8:46 am by Seyfarth Shaw
  Then in 2016, the Seventh Circuit created a circuit split with its decision in Lewis v. [read post]