Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 6,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 7:21 am
In fact, federal lands are owned by the United States, not by any particular federal agency. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 1:01 am
”
In Korematsu v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
” Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:27 pm
” Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 3:03 pm
United States (right to counsel) , Nielson v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 2:22 pm
United States (tribal enrollment)United States v. 43.47 acres of land (eminent domain, land claims)Segura v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:38 am
It hurts because I've been spending more time than a Texan should watching the opinions come out of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am
The Fifth Circuit did no better in United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 9:54 am
For example, in Weinberger v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
The United States Supreme Court reversed and held that the Florida Supreme Court erred on both grounds. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm
The opinion is more or less mandated by United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:49 am
" The Court noted that the facts in State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 12:49 am
" The Court noted that the facts in State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 11:30 am
Hubley Ashton and Maxwell Evarts, who argued United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
In Leone v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
In Leone v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:49 am
Summary of presentation: On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in American Electric Power, et al v Connecticut, et al (10-174) ("AEP"), a case filed by eight states, one city and three land trusts seeking an order requiring five of the nation's largest coal-fired power producers to reduce their emissions for at least a decade. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:00 am
This would be devastating to gun-related commerce throughout the United States. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
In 2003, he pled guilty to one count of “counterfeit of a registered mark” in violation of California Penal Code § 350(a)(2), which imposes criminal penalties on any person who “willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office…” In… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
