Search for: "Levis v. Levis" Results 2361 - 2380 of 3,007
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2010, 11:13 pm by war
As affirmed by Gummow J in Wingate Marketing Pty Ltd v Levi Strauss & Co[30], “whilst a trade mark remains on goods, it functions as an indicator of the person who attached or authorised the initial use of the mark”. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:28 am
However, the Supreme Court had never drawn such a distinction, according to the franchisor, and had long held that there be a substantial nexus between a state and an out-of state business before any tax could be levied. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:26 am by Amanda Sanders (UK)
  The purpose of the increase is to fund health and social care and from April 2023, the increase will be replaced by a separate health and social care levy and the NIC rates will revert to their current level. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 9:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
  But the prices that these outlets charge may depend on whether Pender is located within an Indian reservation and whether they have to pay a tax levied by the Omaha Indian tribe. [read post]
26 May 2021, 9:05 pm by Christopher R. Yukins
Supreme Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:31 pm by Maddy Carter
Supreme Court approved in West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm by Marie Louise
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard:  Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
Canada On 29 November 2022, judgement was handed down in Kaur v. [read post]