Search for: "Long v State"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 45,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2025, 12:30 pm
Pursuant to Section 207 of the State Administrative Procedure Act (SAPA), notice is hereby provided of rules adopted by the New York State Civil Service Commission and the President of the New York State Civil Service Commission during calendar years 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2020 which remain in effect. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 5:22 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 5:00 pm
In Robey v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 1:53 pm
(People v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:28 am
Concepcion There has long been talk of the pr0-business conservative majority that currently comprises the United State’s Supreme Court. [read post]
28 May 2020, 8:26 pm
The state statute codified into law the California Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 11:44 am
–Ticketmaster v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 6:55 am
California.), Ginsburg opened by explaining why the traditional Mathews v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:45 pm
In addition to Before Roe v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 12:29 pm
I am doubtful that Justice Barrett would have joined United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 2:57 pm
Neil V. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
The decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
The decision in Janus v. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:29 am
Just last week in ACLU v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 8:25 pm
” McClay v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:46 am
His judgment stated that “the harm caused by the repudiation of the promise is not the same as the detriment suffered. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm
Padilla One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
The result of cascading divisionals is that the precise scope of patent protection remains obscure, leading to long term commercial uncertainty. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:31 pm
” United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 7:30 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 12/3/09Cite: Aspen Marketing Svcs., Inc. v. [read post]
