Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2361 - 2380
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm
Du Cros Ltd. (1913) AC 624 at 634, 635) Lord Parker of Waddington having remarked upon the difficulty of finding the right criterion by which to determine whether a proposed mark is or is not "adapted to distinguish" the applicant's goods defined the crucial question practically as I have stated it, and added two sentences which have often been quoted but to which it is well to return for an understanding of the problem in a case such as the present. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 7:55 am
The case of Gas and Dubois v France. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Concluding on the basis of previous authorities that ‘attributability’ had been interpreted as requiring a ‘real possibility of a causal link’ (para 35), Lord Walker expressed the view that it was therefore a legal impossibility for a claimant to lack knowledge of attributability once the claim had been issued, given that the claim form contained a statement of truth which stated as much (see also per Lord Wilson at para 3). [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Concluding on the basis of previous authorities that ‘attributability’ had been interpreted as requiring a ‘real possibility of a causal link’ (para 35), Lord Walker expressed the view that it was therefore a legal impossibility for a claimant to lack knowledge of attributability once the claim had been issued, given that the claim form contained a statement of truth which stated as much (see also per Lord Wilson at para 3). [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 9:39 am
Lotto for Blotto : Ex Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini clears Alex Salmond ALEX SALMOND, Scotland’s First Minister has been cleared of any wrongdoing in hosting events at Bute House which included meetings with Scots Euromillions Lotto winners Colin & Chris Weir who have stated they will donate substantial sums to the SNP’s independence referendum. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:32 am
But it also states that when the action was raised, £8,000 of fees from one invoice were outstanding from one partner’s accounts. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 11:21 pm
She relied by analogy on the decision of the House in Kay v Lambeth London Borough Council [2006] UKHL 10, [2006] 2 AC 465, where the House considered the article 8 right to respect for the home. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Lord Walker stated that it is “certainly disturbing” [93]. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am
KF 505 ZC2 D528 2012 Family law, gender and the state / Alison Diduck and Felicity Kaganas. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 10:05 pm
This view of law as propounded by author Graham Virgo in his celebrated book The Principles of the Law of Restitution has been accepted by a later decision of the House of Lords (now the UK Supreme Court) in Sempra Metals Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:35 am
However, none of these highly defamatory rumours will be published by Scottish Law Reporter.BIG NAMES, BIG SHAME, AND LEVY MCRAEFormer Lord Advocate now Dame Elish Angiolini employed Levy McRae to go after anti abuse campaigner. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
However, in principle, the question of negligence is a matter for the Claimants to establish but the question of inevitability is, as stated in Manchester Corp v Farnworth for Thames Water to establish. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:59 am
In Jones v Saudi Arabia the House of Lords concluded that the legal test for establishing the requisite connection between the impugned acts of the foreign state official and the foreign state as a corporate entity should be supplied by the rules of attribution in the law of state responsibility. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
” Roadcap v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:45 am
Lord Justice Moore-Bick stated he did not think that that the parties' "express choice of Brazilian law to govern the substantive contract is sufficient evidence of an implied choice of Brazilian law to govern the arbitration agreement". [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:06 pm
Assange v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:25 am
Next time he should proclaim himself “Lord Vader of the South” instead. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:16 am
In IndusInd Bank v. [read post]
