Search for: "Marks v. State" Results 2361 - 2380 of 19,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 7:30 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix
The Supreme Court’s approach to determining where a person is ‘ordinarily resident’ for these purposes marks a departure from previous case law. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
Netzsch-Feinmahltechnik GmbH, Serial No. 79100238 (March 25, 2014) [not precedential].We know from Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we celebrate the wonder of human existence and renew our resolve to build a culture of life where every person of every age is protected, valued, and cherished.This month, we mark nearly 50 years since the United States Supreme Court’s Roe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:48 am by Brian Shiffrin
In discharging the duties of his office in this case, the Assistant United States Attorney for the Western District of Texas missed the mark. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:00 pm
In Part One, we discussed how states have responded to the Supreme Court's landmark sales and use tax decision, South Dakota v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 8:37 am
Supreme Court opinion in an argued case issued in Washington State Grange v. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:24 am by CJLF Staff
  Mark Berman of the Washington Post reports that it was the state's first execution since the U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 11:21 am
 * Book Review: Trade Marks Law by Glen GibbonsKatfriend Shane Smyth shares his thoughts on the second edition of Trade Marks Law, by Glen Gibbons, a book on trade mark law -- written from an Irish viewpoint. * A Milestone: IPKat's 10,000th Post! [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
" Section 3 states that service marks are registrable "in the same manner and with the same effect as trademarks. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
The ruling addresses the notion of "use of trade mark" in on-line advertising and explores possible remedies against trade mark infringements on the internet.* A Monsanto case that could alter the dynamics of technology transfer to IndiaKatfriend Prashant Reddy pens about a wide legal dispute between Monsanto and some Indian seed companies, backed by the Indian government (& state governments). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:42 am by sally
Supreme Court Gow v Grant (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 29 (24 May 2012) Phillips v Mulcaire (Rev 1) [2012] UKSC 28 (24 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) G1 v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 867 (04 July 2012) Daejan Properties Ltd v Campbell [2012] EWCA Civ 875 (19 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Ampurius NU Homes Holdings Ltd v Telford Homes (Creekside) Ltd [2012] EWHC 1820 (Ch) (04 July 2012) Starbucks… [read post]