Search for: "Matter of M C B" Results 2361 - 2380 of 3,550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2012, 5:47 pm by Mandelman
  I’m sure just seeing the raw numbers of complaints was shocking, never mind what was being said. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:02 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
It was not simply a matter of the lack of availability of treatment to prolong life, as in N v UK App. [read post]
13 May 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
My concern is that some of the tickets for popular events run into thousands of pounds and so I’m concerned that the amount is too much. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
It was not simply a matter of the lack of availability of treatment to prolong life, as in N v UK App. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
It was not simply a matter of the lack of availability of treatment to prolong life, as in N v UK App. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (b) Which should have happened under the current system, right?) [read post]
8 May 2012, 3:24 pm by psaljoughian
” One of Juror B’s friends responded: “I’m with [Juror B's wife] … tell them that you asked all your F[ace] B[ook] friends and they think GUILTY. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:03 pm by Frank Bowman
This is my first venture as a blogger, so I’m not quite sure I’ll strike the right note. [read post]
4 May 2012, 7:57 am by Donna Boehme
  As I have written elsewhere, Wal-Mart is Exhibit A, B and C for an independent chief compliance officer (i.e. not beholden to the General Counsel or any other corporate officer) who can oversee, among other things, the integrity of the investigation and the overall internal reporting system. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:24 am by Susan Brenner
At one point another juror, Juror C, who had been `friended’ by Juror A during the trial, responded to her, saying, `[H]opefully it will end on [M]onday. . . . [read post]
1 May 2012, 6:05 pm by Jayne Navarre
The ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct as pertains to trial publicity says: Rule 3.6 Trial Publicity (a) A lawyer who is participating or has participated in the investigation or litigation of a matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated by means of public communication and will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
(c) A patent application involves two different aspects. [read post]